Legislature(1993 - 1994)

02/24/1994 03:00 PM House L&C

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
  HB 309 - DISPOSAL OF DALTON HWY RIGHT-OF-WAY LAND                            
                                                                               
  Number 076                                                                   
                                                                               
  REPRESENTATIVE GENE THERRIAULT, Prime Sponsor of HB 309,                     
  read the following sponsor statement into the record:                        
                                                                               
  This legislation seeks to address a problem recently brought                 
  to my attention concerning land disposals along the Dalton                   
  Highway.  State statutes currently prohibit disposing of                     
  state land within five miles of the right of way of the                      
  Dalton Highway for anything other than oil and gas leases or                 
  for oil and gas exploration, development, productions or                     
  transportation north of 68 degrees north latitude.  Also                     
  prohibited are materials sales for anything other than oil                   
  and gas related activities or for reconstruction or                          
  maintenance of the highway north of 68 degrees north                         
  latitude.  The prohibition prevents a private telephone                      
  company, which is seeking land in order to expand services                   
  to Coldfoot, from obtaining the necessary acreage.  This                     
  legislation would solve the problem and authorize the                        
  Department of Natural Resources to dispose of land to a                      
  licensed public utility or a licensed common carrier.                        
                                                                               
  After proposing legislation to address the communications                    
  issue, I was made aware of larger problems concerning leases                 
  within the entire Dalton Highway corridor, which affect both                 
  the DNR and the Department of Transportation and Public                      
  Facilities.  Since August, 1992, more than 650,000 acres of                  
  land at selected sites along the corridor have been                          
  transferred to the state from BLM.  The land selections                      
  encompass several existing BLM leases.  Because DNR does not                 
  have the authority to renew these leases taken over from the                 
  federal government, the state's ability to manage the land                   
  in the future is at jeopardy.  DNR is also prohibited from                   
  removing or disposing of gravel, which is required for                       
  improving the airport at Deadhorse.  Also affected is the                    
  Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, which                    
  recommends that the bill be amended to allow disposal of                     
  state land and materials for construction, improvement and                   
  maintenance of public facilities.  Such an amendment would                   
  facilitate work on corridor airports, service roads, access                  
  roads and waysides, as well as the entire length of the                      
  Dalton Highway.                                                              
                                                                               
  In response, I have respectfully submitted a sponsor                         
  substitute that would allow for nonresidential development                   
  within "development nodes" such as Coldfoot and Happy                        
  Valley.  It would also allow for land and materials disposal                 
  for reconstruction or maintenance of state highways and                      
  construction or maintenance of airports.                                     
                                                                               
  I urge your favorable vote on this very important                            
  legislation.  Thank you.                                                     
                                                                               
  REP. THERRIAULT stated that he has worked with the                           
  department to define what is a development node and how much                 
  land is being discussed.  The result was to put into statute                 
  specific property descriptions to allay any concerns that                    
  this bill was designed to open up the whole Dalton highway.                  
                                                                               
  REP. THERRIAULT added that currently, for example, in                        
  Coldfoot the Department of Natural Resources can allow the                   
  Department of Transportation to take gravel by simply                        
  maintaining the section of the road around Coldfoot.                         
                                                                               
  REP. PORTER moved adoption of the CS for HB 309.  No                         
  objections were heard; it was so ordered.                                    
                                                                               
  REP. THERRIAULT noted that his intent with HB 309 is to                      
  address the communications question.  He stated that there                   
  is a private communication provider that would like to                       
  expand services.                                                             
                                                                               
  Number 200                                                                   
                                                                               
  CHAIRMAN HUDSON asked the sponsor to run through the                         
  differences between the original bill and the CS.                            
                                                                               
  REP. THERRIAULT said that initially HB 309 only dealt with                   
  the communications issue and the CS expands to the                           
  description of the development nodes, which clearly outlines                 
  what property development could take place in.  The CS also                  
  clarifies the access to materials.                                           
                                                                               
  Number 212                                                                   
                                                                               
  JERRY GALLAGER, Director, Division of Mines, Department of                   
  Natural Resources, testified in support of HB 309.  Mr.                      
  Gallager stated that the department does not believe the                     
  language of HB 309 is not a broad opening of activities on                   
  the Haul road; it simply recognizes generally what is                        
  currently happening.  It will allow the department to                        
  provide for the continuation of these activities.                            
                                                                               
  MR. GALLAGER said that the BLM has given very limited land                   
  along the haul road.  They have given certain permits and                    
  leases that the state is prohibited from renewing in most                    
  cases under AS 19.  This bill would allow for renewals or                    
  grant new authorizations for maintenance of airports and                     
  some other activities.                                                       
                                                                               
  Number 242                                                                   
                                                                               
  MIKE WALLERI, General Council, Tanana Chiefs Conference,                     
  testified against CSHB 309.  The conference did not oppose                   
  the original bill and did not have any problems with the                     
  majority of the sponsor's intentions.  The conference                        
  believes there are needs for telecommunications, a need for                  
  the department to manage its existing leases its inherited,                  
  a need for gravel on the road, and a strong need for safety.                 
                                                                               
  MR. WALLERI stated that the Chiefs' concern is that the CS                   
  is overly broad and that it would open up the haul road to a                 
  unregulated amount of development.                                           
                                                                               
  MR. WALLERI stated that the corridor is a critical part of                   
  the state of Alaska.  The current laws are a product of past                 
  legislatures balancing environmental issues, subsistence                     
  issues and industrial development of the North Slope.                        
                                                                               
  MR. WALLERI explained that the development node concept                      
  comes out of a BLM plan that was adopted by the prior                        
  federal administration.  This invoked litigation against the                 
  BLM.  The BLM adopted the Resource Management Plan, RMP,                     
  which identified the development of development nodes and                    
  encouraged them.                                                             
                                                                               
  MR. WALLERI noted that due to the litigation referenced                      
  above and its subsequent settlement, the BLM has undertaken                  
  a comprehensive review of the RMP.  Mr. Walleri believes if                  
  the state relies on the prior plan, which may not be valid,                  
  the state may find itself in another controversy creating                    
  inholdings in federal enclaves.                                              
                                                                               
  MR. WALLERI stated the major problem with the committee                      
  substitute is nonresidential disposals.  He added that the                   
  history of nonresidential settlement in Alaska has been                      
  residential in effect.                                                       
                                                                               
  MR. WALLERI suggested deletion of that section of the                        
  committee substitute.  He added that everything the                          
  department said it wanted to do in that area could be done                   
  without this section.                                                        
                                                                               
  Number 353                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. THERRIAULT asked Mr. Walleri if that would allow the                    
  department to renew or renegotiate BLM leases.                               
                                                                               
  Number 363                                                                   
                                                                               
  MR. WALLERI said it may be necessary to amend the bill to                    
  cover that issue, but he added that the bill is much broader                 
  than that.  It does not address existing nonresidential                      
  uses.  He added that the Chiefs do not have any problem with                 
  what is going on in the corridor now, but they don't want to                 
  see a massive land disposal that would cause additional                      
  problems.                                                                    
                                                                               
  Number 373                                                                   
                                                                               
  KEITH QUINTAVELL, North Slope Borough, testified via                         
  teleconference on HB 309.  Mr. Quintavell stated that he                     
  understood the committee to be looking at the committee                      
  substitute for SB 210.  Mr. Quintavell stated that the                       
  section of the bill that provided for disposal of land under                 
  38.05.810(e) was supported by the borough.  That section                     
  clearly states that when public utilities or common carriers                 
  demonstrate need for land can obtain land in this manner.                    
  This serves the public interest.                                             
                                                                               
  MR. QUINTAVELL further stated that the section providing for                 
  the maintenance and construction of airports and highways is                 
  also in the public interest.                                                 
                                                                               
  MR. QUINTAVELL, North Slope Borough, testified against the                   
  inclusion of developmental nodes.                                            
                                                                               
  MR. QUINTAVELL stated that the North Slope Borough has                       
  municipal land selections under Title 29 at Deadhorse,                       
  Franklin Bluffs and Happy Valley.  The North Slope Borough                   
  interprets the prohibitions on 19.40.200 to exclude Title 38                 
  types of disposals.  Mr. Quintavell said the borough feels                   
  that if there is a desire to allow development at these                      
  areas, the simplest way to accomplish it would be to convey                  
  the land selections noted above to the North Slope Borough.                  
                                                                               
  MR. QUINTAVELL noted that the Department of Natural                          
  Resources in Fairbanks has told the borough that they cannot                 
  convey the land along the haul road that have been selected                  
  under Title 29 because of the prohibition in 19.40.200.  The                 
  department has asked for the borough's support in lifting                    
  the prohibitions on all Title 38 types of disposals.  In                     
  January, the borough asked the commissioner of Natural                       
  Resources for clarification on 19.40.200.  The borough feels                 
  that this provision clearly states that the state is not to                  
  dispose of land under Title 38 not Title 29.  Therefore,                     
  they do not understand why the state does not convey to the                  
  borough their land selections.                                               
                                                                               
  MR. QUINTAVELL said that the State of Alaska has not                         
  produced a land use plan required under 38.04.065.  The                      
  borough supported a plan before and land disposals.                          
                                                                               
  Number 433                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. THERRIAULT asked Mr. Quintavell, if those selections                    
  went through, would the North Slope want to sell gravel                      
  products from your land?                                                     
                                                                               
  Number 440                                                                   
                                                                               
  MR. QUINTAVELL responded that the North Slope would be                       
  interested in selling gravel, as well as providing other                     
  facilities; i.e., a truck stop, etc.                                         
                                                                               
  MR. QUINTAVELL added that the North Slope Borough does not                   
  believe that enacting new legislation was necessary for this                 
  type of development to take place.  This development could                   
  take place under existing laws by conveying lands to the                     
  North Slope Borough under Title 29 and allowing the                          
  development to proceed in that fashion.                                      
                                                                               
  Number 455                                                                   
                                                                               
  EARL FINKLER, City of Barrow, testified via teleconference                   
  against HB 309.  Mr. Finkler stated the city supports the                    
  borough in opposition to the opening of the road, and stated                 
  concerns about the comprehensive planning regarding the road                 
  by all parties involved.                                                     
                                                                               
  MR. FINKLER stated that he asked, at the last hearing, if                    
  there would be any impacts of this legislation on the                        
  original purpose of the restrictions.  He stated that his                    
  understanding was that those restrictions were put in to                     
  preserve maximum opportunity for the efficient                               
  transportation and support of oil and gas development.                       
                                                                               
  MR. FINKLER added that the City of Barrow has long been                      
  concerned about some other state disposals, in particular,                   
  the Barrow airport and adjacent construction sites for the                   
  airports.  The city would like to see the state get back to                  
  these issues before they deal with too many other land                       
  disposal issues.                                                             
                                                                               
  Number 475                                                                   
                                                                               
  CHAIRMAN HUDSON stated that the whole issue of land disposal                 
  currently tied up in the mental health trust litigation is                   
  gaining attention by the administration and he is hopeful                    
  some of these issues will be settled.                                        
                                                                               
  CHAIRMAN HUDSON asked if Mr. Quintavell would put together a                 
  short position paper with suggestions on how the legislation                 
  can accommodate those points not in dispute and satisfy the                  
  concerns he brought up.                                                      
                                                                               
  Number 495                                                                   
                                                                               
  CHAIRMAN HUDSON asked the sponsor if the committee should                    
  look for an amendment that would accommodate the concerns                    
  presented.                                                                   
                                                                               
  Number 500                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. THERRIAULT responded that he did not have a problem                     
  with changing the language, as long as the end result is the                 
  same.  He noted that Mr. Walleri suggested that a section                    
  could be deleted and still achieve all the goals, and he                     
  would like further information on this.                                      
                                                                               
  Number 509                                                                   
                                                                               
  MR. GALLAGER disagreed that Mr. Walleri's assessment.  Mr.                   
  Gallager believed that the language on page, 1, line 13, was                 
  needed in order to dispose of gravel; and to issue longer                    
  term leases and whatever is necessary for development along                  
  the haul road.                                                               
                                                                               
  Number 515                                                                   
                                                                               
  CHAIRMAN HUDSON asked that Rep. Therriault and Mr. Gallager                  
  obtain the necessary information from the City of Barrow and                 
  the North Slope Borough and put together a revised draft                     
  that satisfies the interests and concerns.                                   
                                                                               
  Number 532                                                                   
                                                                               
  REP. THERRIAULT noted that SB 210 is a similar bill and he                   
  thought it had passed the Senate and was being transmitted                   
  to the House.  He stated it was his intent to use SB 210 as                  
  a vehicle and work with the sponsor, Sen. Sharp to seek                      
  passage.                                                                     

Document Name Date/Time Subjects